LOGAN, Utah (AP) — A Utah art teacher was fired amid complaints that images of classical paintings containing nudity were passed out in a classroom and seen by sixth-graders, a newspaper reported.
Mateo Rueda said he wasn’t aware that a set of educational postcards from the elementary school library contained a few works depicting nudity when he handed them out during a lesson, the Herald Journal newspaper said Thursday.
He removed the cards when they made students uncomfortable, the paper reported .
“This is not material at all that I would use. I had no idea,” Rueda said.
He said he has requested a hearing and plans to appeal his termination to clear his reputation.
A few days after the Dec. 4 lesson, police went to Lincoln Elementary School in Hyrum, about 80 miles (129 kilometers) north of Salt Lake City, to investigate a complaint that Rudea was showing pornography to students.
Cache County deputies found Principal Jeni Buist shredding postcards — at the request of the school district — that contained nudity, said Sheriff Chad Jensen.
Deputies showed some of the images to prosecutors, who decided they were not pornography, Jenson said.
The Cache County School District declined to comment, saying it’s a personnel matter.
The two images seen by students were the Impressionist-era portrait “Iris Tree” by Italian painter Amedeo Modigliani and the Rococo-style partial nude “Odalisque” by 18th-century artist Francois Boucher, the teacher said.
Parent Venessa Rose Pixton said she’s upset because Rueda’s handling of the situation belittled students, including her 11-year-old son.
“He said Mr. Mateo even told the class ‘There’s nothing wrong with female nipples. You guys need to grow up and be mature about this,'” Pixton said.
Rueda denied making that statement and said he simply explained the human body is often portrayed in art displayed in museums.
Some parents are supporting Rueda.
Kamee Jensen wrote a letter to the Herald Journal defending him and said her daughter wasn’t offended by the pictures.
“She was just very upset that her teacher was in trouble,” Jensen said.
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @STGnews
Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
What a bunch of self-righteous, arrogant, ignorant, hypocrites.
Hell, why don’t they take this teacher out, tar and feather him, and ride him out of town on a rail. Meanwhile, let’s all pretend shock that our precious children are going to become sexually active from viewing a work of art. These people would have been right at home in Salem, during the witch hunts!
They fit right in here in The People’s Republic of Utah.
Seriously? Geez. The extremism is out of control. The other end of the spectrum is pushing ‘non-gender’ to our kids and how to give oral sex. What the hell is wrong?
How to give oral sex????? Where do you get your information? Provide us with a source that backs your stupid claim of kids being taught to give oral sex.
What is wrong with people in Utah and education..it’s art and history. There were many artists who painted nudity withsome fabric etc . Flowers e5c.. look at ceiling in Sistine chapel in Vatican church..angels and saints painted in nude positions..not offensive.. in Utah kids experiment with earlier than 6 th grade, have babies at 15 and16.. but din t understand art…itsthe parents fault.
oh my goodness! FEMALE BREASTS AND BUTTOCKS! these children will be scarred for life! Imagine if these poor traumatized children had seen a painting depicting a penis!!! It would’ve ruined them!!!
None of these people involved have ever been to the shopping arcade at Caesar’s Palace in Vegas…
What a bunch of BS….better not show them anything from ancient Rome….the teacher will win and the state will pay
The teacher will sue and be set for life….stupid school district telling the principal to shred the postcards….what’s next? Book burnings?
This is just one more example of what the belief in a delusional fairy tale causes.
Agreed. Hypocrites…
The picture shown is not the full picture. He did not just show nudity————The picture is covered by the man’s face. Look at the feet of the woman. Her whole backside is shown and legs spread and also shows her other parts. It was not nudity as art goes but more sexual in nature and on the lines of Porn. He was expressing art as porn art not nudity in art. There is more to the story and that is why the newspaper even had to cover up the picture. If done right, some nudity is expressive without being vulgar. Get the REAL PICTURE. The artist may even have a history of porn. I have had art teachers teach about the simplistic nudity in art and the body as a whole in pictures. Done right at that age it will work and help teach. But vulgar art has no place in Utah’s classrooms.
You are a liar and less than credible. Below is the link to the actual piece of art which doesn’t depict what you claim.
blueford please explain why you (religious) drivin whackjobs are so obsessed with human sexuality in all the wrong ways?
You people are making sex an unhealthy blemish on humanity, grow up already.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fran%C3%A7ois_Boucher_-_Brown_Odalisque_(L%27Odalisque_Brune)_-_WGA2879.jpg
You wonder why many other states stereotype Utah as a haven for religious zealots and prudish conservatives.
Only in Utah. When will people understand that the more you repress and suppress, the more likely people will want it more but have a twisted understanding of such a natural biological thing? Get educated and stop making such a big deal of something that should be natural and beautiful.